GEOAI Score
The GEOAI Score ranks areas by adherence to the criteria defined for each analytical model. Normalized from 0 to 100, it represents an area's relative priority within that model and context.
Components and weights are not necessarily constant. The structure may vary by mineral, region, objective, data availability, and the evolution of technology and models.
Potential, Confidence, and Opportunity
| Indicator | Question answered |
|---|---|
| Potential Score | Measures how available evidence fits the model of interest. It answers what relative potential has been identified. |
| Confidence Score | Measures information coverage, resolution, currency, diversity, and consistency. It answers how much is known about the area. |
| Opportunity Score | Adds the conditions for turning a target into a structurable project, including rights, access, restrictions, infrastructure, cost, and capital. |
Example: high potential with low confidence
In this scenario, existing signals would justify close attention, but the quantity or quality of information would still be insufficient for high confidence. The separation prevents absence of information from being mistaken for absence of potential.
It also helps identify where new data may produce the greatest knowledge gain and guides incremental allocation of research and capital.
- 95/100
- illustrative Potential Score
- 42/100
- illustrative Confidence Score
- 67/100
- illustrative Opportunity Score
Illustrative Project Scorecard
When a target advances, the analysis incorporates the dimensions needed to evaluate the project and track how its profile changes with new evidence.
| BTR-001 example indicator | Score |
|---|---|
| Geological | 92 |
| Data Confidence | 74 |
| Land | 88 |
| Regulatory | 65 |
| Environmental | 90 |
| Infrastructure | 82 |
| Economic | 78 |
| Overall Project Score | 84 |
Responsible use in decisions
The scorecard creates a common language for comparing opportunities and tracking change, but it does not replace technical analysis or diligence. Decisions consider evidence and complementary technical, territorial, legal, regulatory, environmental, and economic assessments.